Translation and Philosophy. The Case of Averroes' Commentaries, 1994
By: Charles E. Butterworth
Title Translation and Philosophy. The Case of Averroes' Commentaries
Type Article
Language English
Date 1994
Journal International Journal of Middle East Studies
Volume 26
Issue 1
Pages 19–35
Categories Influence, Commentary, Transmission, Poetics
Author(s) Charles E. Butterworth
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
With particular reference to Averroes' "Commentary on Aristotle's Poetics," it is argued that Averroes could not possibly have understood Aristotle's "Poetics" as it is understood in the modern world. Averroes' "Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Poetics" is also critiqued.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"446","_score":null,"_source":{"id":446,"authors_free":[{"id":589,"entry_id":446,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":123,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","free_first_name":"Charles E.","free_last_name":"Butterworth","norm_person":{"id":123,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/105338856X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/41853950","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Charles E. Butterworth"}}],"entry_title":"Translation and Philosophy. The Case of Averroes' Commentaries","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Translation and Philosophy. The Case of Averroes' Commentaries"},"abstract":"With particular reference to Averroes' \"Commentary on Aristotle's Poetics,\" it is argued that Averroes could not possibly have understood Aristotle's \"Poetics\" as it is understood in the modern world. Averroes' \"Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Poetics\" is also critiqued.","btype":3,"date":"1994","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/164050","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":44,"category_name":"Poetics","link":"bib?categories[]=Poetics"}],"authors":[{"id":123,"full_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":446,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"International Journal of Middle East Studies","volume":"26","issue":"1","pages":"19\u201335"}},"sort":[1994]}

Mittlerer Kommentar von Averroes zur Nikomachischen Ethik des Aristoteles, 1992
By: Jerzy B. Korolec
Title Mittlerer Kommentar von Averroes zur Nikomachischen Ethik des Aristoteles
Type Article
Language German
Date 1992
Journal Mediaevalia philosophica Polonorum
Volume 31
Pages 61–118
Categories Ethics, Commentary, Aristotle
Author(s) Jerzy B. Korolec
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"441","_score":null,"_source":{"id":441,"authors_free":[{"id":584,"entry_id":441,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":751,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jerzy B. Korolec","free_first_name":"Jerzy B.","free_last_name":"Korolec","norm_person":{"id":751,"first_name":"Jerzy B.","last_name":"Korolec","full_name":"Jerzy B. Korolec","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/154973629","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/40859886","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jerzy B. Korolec"}}],"entry_title":"Mittlerer Kommentar von Averroes zur Nikomachischen Ethik des Aristoteles","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Mittlerer Kommentar von Averroes zur Nikomachischen Ethik des Aristoteles"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1992","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":751,"full_name":"Jerzy B. Korolec","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":441,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediaevalia philosophica Polonorum","volume":"31","issue":null,"pages":"61\u2013118"}},"sort":[1992]}

Yeda'aya ha-Penini's Unusual Conception of Void, 1997
By: Ruth Glasner
Title Yeda'aya ha-Penini's Unusual Conception of Void
Type Article
Language English
Date 1997
Journal Science in Context
Volume 10
Issue 3
Pages 453-470
Categories Tradition and Reception, Commentary
Author(s) Ruth Glasner
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
It was commonly accepted in the middle ages that void within or outside the world is impossible. The paper presents a quite unusual conception of void, which is described in Yeda'aya ha-Penini's commentary on Ibn Rushd's epitome on Aristotle's Physics. According to this conception there is a thin layer of void between the water and the inner surface of the container. Ha-Penini describes two versions of this conception. According to one version this void layer is three-dimensional but thin, according to the other it is two-dimensional. The first part of the paper shows how ha-Penini “corrects” the text of Ibn Rushd, putting into it ideas which were unknown to Ibn Rushd. It is argued that, though the two views are rejected by Ibn Rushd, ha-Penini himself partly accepts (his version of) these views. The second part of the paper argues that ha-Penini could not have found these views in the Arabic-Hebrew tradition, and it seems that he relied on Christian sources. If this is indeed so, the paper presents an example of acquaintance of Hebrew scholars in southern France with Scholastic science in the first half of the fourteenth century.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5785","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5785,"authors_free":[{"id":6700,"entry_id":5785,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":737,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ruth Glasner","free_first_name":"Ruth","free_last_name":"Glasner","norm_person":{"id":737,"first_name":"Ruth","last_name":"Glasner","full_name":"Ruth Glasner","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/138576793","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/46394953","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ruth Glasner"}}],"entry_title":"Yeda'aya ha-Penini's Unusual Conception of Void","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Yeda'aya ha-Penini's Unusual Conception of Void"},"abstract":"It was commonly accepted in the middle ages that void within or outside the world is impossible. The paper presents a quite unusual conception of void, which is described in Yeda'aya ha-Penini's commentary on Ibn Rushd's epitome on Aristotle's Physics. According to this conception there is a thin layer of void between the water and the inner surface of the container. Ha-Penini describes two versions of this conception. According to one version this void layer is three-dimensional but thin, according to the other it is two-dimensional. The first part of the paper shows how ha-Penini \u201ccorrects\u201d the text of Ibn Rushd, putting into it ideas which were unknown to Ibn Rushd. It is argued that, though the two views are rejected by Ibn Rushd, ha-Penini himself partly accepts (his version of) these views. The second part of the paper argues that ha-Penini could not have found these views in the Arabic-Hebrew tradition, and it seems that he relied on Christian sources. If this is indeed so, the paper presents an example of acquaintance of Hebrew scholars in southern France with Scholastic science in the first half of the fourteenth century.","btype":3,"date":"1997","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":737,"full_name":"Ruth Glasner","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5785,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Science in Context","volume":"10","issue":"3","pages":"453-470"}},"sort":["Yeda'aya ha-Penini's Unusual Conception of Void"]}

À propos du "fondamental" et de "l'essentiel" dans le commentaire d'Averroès sur la "métaphysique" d'Aristote, 1995
By: Laurence Bauloye
Title À propos du "fondamental" et de "l'essentiel" dans le commentaire d'Averroès sur la "métaphysique" d'Aristote
Type Article
Language French
Date 1995
Journal Revue de Philosophie Ancienne
Volume 13
Issue 2
Pages 225-238
Categories Commentary, Aristotle, Metaphysics
Author(s) Laurence Bauloye
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5729","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5729,"authors_free":[{"id":6637,"entry_id":5729,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":814,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Laurence Bauloye","free_first_name":"Laurence ","free_last_name":"Bauloye","norm_person":{"id":814,"first_name":"Laurence","last_name":"Bauloye","full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/152664165","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/59337898","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Laurence Bauloye"}}],"entry_title":"\u00c0 propos du \"fondamental\" et de \"l'essentiel\" dans le commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s sur la \"m\u00e9taphysique\" d'Aristote","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"\u00c0 propos du \"fondamental\" et de \"l'essentiel\" dans le commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s sur la \"m\u00e9taphysique\" d'Aristote"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/24354593","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":814,"full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5729,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue de Philosophie Ancienne","volume":"13","issue":"2","pages":"225-238"}},"sort":["\u00c0 propos du \"fondamental\" et de \"l'essentiel\" dans le commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s sur la \"m\u00e9taphysique\" d'Aristote"]}

  • PAGE 2 OF 2